Re: git-svn and huge data and modifying the git-svn-HEAD branch directly
- From
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
- Date
- Mar 1, 2006, 18:25 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0603011023080.22647@g5.osdl.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <200603011906.33433.Josef.Weidendorfer@gmx.de>
On Wed, 1 Mar 2006, Josef Weidendorfer wrote:
Show 10 quoted lines
> > On Wednesday 01 March 2006 18:40, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > But if somebody does the get_sha1() magic, and Junio agrees, then I think > > it would be a great thing to do. > > Yes. > > git log origin/master.. > > is really not that bad
It really is.
Think like a user. If I pull from "origin", then the name of that thing is "origin", not "origin/master" or "o/master". A user doesn't care what the remote branch name is - the whole _point_ of the .git/remotes/xyzzy file is to give a short description that includes the names of the branches you pull from.
The good news is that "get_sha1()" shouldn't be that hard to extend on. Just add a case at the end that says "do we have a .git/remotes/%s file, and if so, parse it".
Linus