Re: [PATCH] add -C[NUM] to git-am
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Feb 8, 2007, 00:07 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.63.0702080106200.22628@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <eqdos9$4up$2@sea.gmane.org>
Hi,
[please Cc me when replying]
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Jakub Narebski wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > >> - we will be keeping applymbox after all. > > > > Why? Does -am not do strictly more than applymbox? > > From documentation, it looks like applymbox can get signoff from a file, > and am not.
Seems like just another low-hanging fruit. But I cannot believe that this is the only reason to keep applymbox.
Ciao, Dscho