From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 00:07:13 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add -C[NUM] to git-am
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0702080106200.22628@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
In-Reply-To: <eqdos9$4up$2@sea.gmane.org>

Hi,

[please Cc me when replying]

On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Jakub Narebski wrote:

> Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > 
> >>  - we will be keeping applymbox after all.
> > 
> > Why? Does -am not do strictly more than applymbox?
> 
> From documentation, it looks like applymbox can get signoff from a file, 
> and am not.

Seems like just another low-hanging fruit. But I cannot believe that this 
is the only reason to keep applymbox.

Ciao,
Dscho