Re: Can git be tweaked to work cross-platform, on FAT32?
Hi,
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006, Florian v. Savigny wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> DO your answers imply that it is NOT possible (by "possible", I mean of
> course: possible without re-programming the source code ;-)) to compile
> git in a way that would enable it to work DIRECTLY with a local
> repository on FAT32 from both Windows and Linux (or, perhaps more
> simple: to work directly with a repository on FAT32 under Linux)?
My answer was not so clear...
Question: Is it possible to use git on a FAT32 filesystem?
Answer: Yes.
Question: Is it possible to access such a repository from both Linux and
Windows?
Answer: Yes.
Question: Is there anything that could cause problems?
Answer: Yes. The working directory is a problem.
- Symlinks for example. Don't use them.
- Umlauts: don't use them.
- The index has to be updated, since the stat information is
unlikely to match. A simple "git status" should suffice, though.
- Permissions: the permission handling of Linux and Windows are
quite different. If you initialize the repository with Cygwin,
it automatically sets core.filemode=false, if you initalize(d)
with Linux, you have to adjust manually.
Question: Are there other shortcomings to this approach?
Answer: Definitely. Most are only annoying (like the performance of FAT32,
which literally sucks), but some are different: for example, if you
compile things in the working directory, you will be unhappy.
Show 6 quoted lines
> 3. ad Johannes: This does sound quite simple and straightforward. If I
> got it right, it would involve having one repository on a, say,
> ext2 partition to work with under Linux, and one on a FAT32
> partition to work with under Windows, and syncing the two after
> booting (fetching from FAT32) and before shutting down (pushing to
> FAT32) Linux.
> It is quite interesting, BTW, that git can /sync/ with a repository
> on FAT32 under Linux, but not work with it.
You can. But I wouldn't. I like to keep separations clean and obvious.
Ciao,