Re: [PATCH] sha1_name: accept output of git-describe
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Sep 20, 2006, 21:31 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.63.0609202330190.19042@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v64figrhu.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
Hi,
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Shouldn't you also verify the leading ref (most likely a tag) > exists (and optionally check that it precedes the commit you > decoded into, but that is probably more expensive than it's > worth)?
I debated this with myself. But there is the cost, and more importantly the possibility that your victim^H^H^H^H^H^Hother side does not have the tag at all (for whatever reasons).
Ciao, Dscho