Re: Huge win, compressing a window of delta runs as a unit
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Aug 17, 2006, 17:05 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.63.0608171900130.28360@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0608171220260.11359@localhost.localdomain>
Hi,
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
Show 18 quoted lines
> On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, Jon Smirl wrote: > > > > > On 8/17/06, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote: > > > > At least, the delta-chains should be limited by size (_not_ by number of > > > > deltas: you can have huge deltas, and if you have to unpack 5 huge deltas > > > > before getting to the huge delta you really need, it takes really long). > > > > > > This is not an obvious conclusion. > > > > The big win is bought by having _one_ zlib stream for multiple deltas, > > right? > > > > So, everytime you want to access the _last_ delta in the chain, you unpack > > _all_ of them. > > This is the case whether deltas are separately deflated or not.
Oh, now I get it! The delta chain is comprised of exactly those deltas which are needed to reconstruct a certain object from another object which was stored undeltified in the pack.
Now it makes sense to me that they could be bundled before being deflated. In the pack-index, the objects of that delta-chain could just point to the delta-chain object. Which has a mini-index in its extended header.
Or did I misunderstand again?
Ciao, Dscho