Re: [RFC] shallow clone
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Feb 1, 2006, 14:47 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.63.0602011545390.28923@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vr76oun9o.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
Hi,
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> This is whacky, but another completely different strategy is to > introduce remote alternates.
I'd rather go with the original plan. After all, you do not really need the cut-off commit objects. All needed objects are available on the server side: it just has to have a way to know which ones to send.
Ciao, Dscho