From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 14:47:24 GMT
Subject: Re: [RFC] shallow clone
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0602011545390.28923@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
In-Reply-To: <7vr76oun9o.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>

Hi,

On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> This is whacky, but another completely different strategy is to
> introduce remote alternates.

I'd rather go with the original plan. After all, you do not really need 
the cut-off commit objects. All needed objects are available on the server 
side: it just has to have a way to know which ones to send.

Ciao,
Dscho