Re: [RFC] t5500 considered dangerous
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Dec 26, 2005, 23:37 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.63.0512270037240.4002@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.63.0512270018310.3067@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
Of course, it is t5300. Sorry for the noise.