Re: [RFC] Looking at multiple ancestors in merge
- From
Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
- Date
- Aug 26, 2005, 05:16 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.63.0508260108290.23242@iabervon.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.63.0508242249030.23242@iabervon.org>
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
> Of course, this is going to take a bit of work, because read-tree > currently puts all of its arguments into the cache and then works on > merging, and taking multiple ancestors requires putting them somewhere > else, because they won't fit in the cache.
I've started this, and have gotten as far as having read-tree accept > 3 trees and ignore everything but the last 3. Am I correct in assuming that if I break read-tree in any way, some test will fail?
-Daniel *This .sig left intentionally blank*