From: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 05:16:55 GMT
Subject: Re: [RFC] Looking at multiple ancestors in merge
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0508260108290.23242@iabervon.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0508242249030.23242@iabervon.org>

On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Daniel Barkalow wrote:

> Of course, this is going to take a bit of work, because read-tree
> currently puts all of its arguments into the cache and then works on
> merging, and taking multiple ancestors requires putting them somewhere
> else, because they won't fit in the cache.

I've started this, and have gotten as far as having read-tree accept > 3
trees and ignore everything but the last 3. Am I correct in assuming that
if I break read-tree in any way, some test will fail?

	-Daniel
*This .sig left intentionally blank*