Re: Please undo "Use git-merge instead of git-resolve in git-pull"
- From
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
- Date
- Sep 21, 2005, 22:03 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.58.0509211501130.2553@g5.osdl.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vu0genlc1.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > * I thought you do not multitask and wonder why you are merging > while you still have local changes, but that does not justify > this regression.
I've always multi-tasked, but when I started git I was ready to drop it. Then I came up with that wonderful "merge in the index" approach, and I could do it again, and I was _soo_ happy.
I often have local changes in my tree that I don't want to commit but that I'm testing out. Havign them interfere with merging other peoples work would mean that I'd have to have a totally separate tree for that, which I could do, but I'm much much happier not having to.
Linus