Re: Please undo "Use git-merge instead of git-resolve in git-pull"
- From
- Olivier Galibert <galibert@pobox.com>
- Date
- Sep 22, 2005, 00:54 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20050922005455.GA93041@dspnet.fr.eu.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20050921.172849.103555057.davem@davemloft.net>
On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 05:28:49PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> You know, I personally was unaware that this was supported until now. > I have been always reverting local debugging changes in order to merge > other people's work in, then reapply the debugging changes afterwards.
Why don't you commit the debugging changes, go back one step in the tree (reverting them through git in practice), merge other's people work then merge the debugging changes back in ? You never know when the debug changes will be useful again, so it's nice to have them in your private tree, and this method makes it reasonably automatic.
OG.