Re: "git revert" (Re: pci_update_resource() getting called on sparc64)
- From
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
- Date
- Aug 8, 2005, 20:59 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.58.0508081357020.3258@g5.osdl.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vd5oo40mq.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
On Mon, 8 Aug 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > Totally untested. I acquired your habit of coding in my e-mail > client ;-).
Looks good. Although I also have this advanced testing habit of just reading the email and if it looks sane it tested out ok ;)
But it strikes me that we could use the "-M" flag to git-diff-tree, which makes it a lot more likely that we can revert renames, even if the file has been slightly changed afterwards.
Linus