Re: Tracking file metadata in git -- fix metastore or enhance git?
- From
Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>
- Date
- Apr 8, 2011, 19:58 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.BSM.4.64L.1104081955490.22999@herc.mirbsd.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20110408194548.GA26094@elie>
Jonathan Nieder dixit:
>Each git commit (try it with "git cat-file commit HEAD) looks like so:
[…]
>So you see, using ordinary files […] makes a lot of >sense.
True. I’d forgotten for a second that git is a stupid content tracker and confused it with a VCS. My bad. Your reasoning is of course sound. (I must admit I personally don’t have much experience with git, other than losing a lot of data once.)
>Now Michael mentioned an alternative, which is to store this >information in separate objects. That way, you could push your
This might be an alternative. RichiH, what are the requirements? I fear that the dotfile way will meet them better, considering that they are versioned together, not separately, and what you told me quickly about the idea.
bye, //mirabilos
--
13:47⎜<tobiasu> if i were omnipotent, i would divide by zero
all day long ;)
(thinking about http://lobacevski.tumblr.com/post/3260866481 by waga)