Re: Tracking file metadata in git -- fix metastore or enhance git?
- From
Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
- Date
- Apr 8, 2011, 10:01 UTC
- Message-ID
- <4D9EDCEA.9010903@drmicha.warpmail.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <BANLkTink-c8JuxnMBCAmXiVwFkBxJrTucw@mail.gmail.com>
Richard Hartmann venit, vidit, dixit 08.04.2011 02:29:
Show 8 quoted lines
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 21:27, Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de> wrote: > >> but seeing that people seem to want to use >> git for keeping their /etc (I use RCS, myself, but volunteered my >> C skill to change metastore if it needs be) there is definitively >> a market for having it there, in a standardised manner. > > etckeeper does exist and it's very useful.
While I think there is some consensus not to have attribs (besides x) in core git, contrib/ may be a good place.
Note that etckeeper and metastore predate our notes feature. By now, a notes tree is a perfect place to store meta information. You can attach notes to blobs perfectly (see textconv-cache). That may be an option for a reimplementation, depending on how you want the versioning of the files to be related with the versioning of the meta data.
Michael