Re: Proposed git mv behavioral change
- From
Michael Witten <mfwitten@mit.edu>
- Date
- Oct 20, 2007, 06:34 UTC
- Message-ID
- <FF5A82CA-8AE3-4E1C-872D-26D938933E1B@MIT.EDU>
- In-Reply-To
- <20071020062400.GA30388@coredump.intra.peff.net>
On 20 Oct 2007, at 2:24:00 AM, Jeff King wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> Because I was having trouble understanding what Michael was trying to > accomplish with his "here are two methods, and one is better" since > they > seemed to do different things. But that is perhaps my fault for > joining > the thread in the middle. I may have simply caused more confusion by > getting involved. :)
The first method is wrong, because I wasn't considering the fact that he may have already staged something.
Because I thought both methods achieve the same result, I called the latter "better", because it is more efficient.
Michael Witten mfwitten