Re: Proposed git mv behavioral change
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Oct 19, 2007, 03:58 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20071019035838.GB18717@coredump.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <C5184350-51A7-46B4-B0C9-E32F79214546@MIT.EDU>
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 11:53:05PM -0400, Michael Witten wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
>> 3. You don't want to commit your changes, so you git-mv in the index >> only without involving your dirty working tree file. > That's exactly what the original poster wanted. > > It's not unreasonable.
I guess. I really think git-stash is your friend here. But you can still do step (3) with git-update-index (I'll leave the exact details as an exercise for the reader).
-Peff