Re: [PATCH] submodule: drop unused sm_name parameter from show_fetch_remotes()
- From
Atharva Raykar <raykar.ath@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jul 23, 2021, 17:12 UTC
- Message-ID
- <E30F287A-0E19-45CD-8CA7-1FDA4DF20C61@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <YPqkHs47VDFBNZ0Z@coredump.intra.peff.net>
On 23-Jul-2021, at 16:42, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
Show 70 quoted lines
>
> On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 01:18:01PM +0530, Atharva Raykar wrote:
>
>> +static void show_fetch_remotes(FILE *output, const char *sm_name, const char *git_dir_path)
>> +{
>> + struct child_process cp_remote = CHILD_PROCESS_INIT;
>> + struct strbuf sb_remote_out = STRBUF_INIT;
>> +
>> + cp_remote.git_cmd = 1;
>> + strvec_pushf(&cp_remote.env_array,
>> + "GIT_DIR=%s", git_dir_path);
>> + strvec_push(&cp_remote.env_array, "GIT_WORK_TREE=.");
>> + strvec_pushl(&cp_remote.args, "remote", "-v", NULL);
>> + if (!capture_command(&cp_remote, &sb_remote_out, 0)) {
>> + char *next_line;
>> + char *line = sb_remote_out.buf;
>> + while ((next_line = strchr(line, '\n')) != NULL) {
>> + size_t len = next_line - line;
>> + if (strip_suffix_mem(line, &len, " (fetch)"))
>> + fprintf(output, " %.*s\n", (int)len, line);
>> + line = next_line + 1;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + strbuf_release(&sb_remote_out);
>> +}
>
> The sm_name parameter is not used here. I don't think it's a bug; we
> just don't need it (there's a message that mentions the name, but it
> happens right before we call the function). Maybe this should go on top
> of ar/submodule-add?
>
> -- >8 --
> Subject: submodule: drop unused sm_name parameter from show_fetch_remotes()
>
> This parameter has not been used since the function was introduced in
> 8c8195e9c3 (submodule--helper: introduce add-clone subcommand,
> 2021-07-10).
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
> ---
> builtin/submodule--helper.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/builtin/submodule--helper.c b/builtin/submodule--helper.c
> index ed4a50c78e..1e65ff599e 100644
> --- a/builtin/submodule--helper.c
> +++ b/builtin/submodule--helper.c
> @@ -2782,7 +2782,7 @@ struct add_data {
> };
> #define ADD_DATA_INIT { .depth = -1 }
>
> -static void show_fetch_remotes(FILE *output, const char *sm_name, const char *git_dir_path)
> +static void show_fetch_remotes(FILE *output, const char *git_dir_path)
> {
> struct child_process cp_remote = CHILD_PROCESS_INIT;
> struct strbuf sb_remote_out = STRBUF_INIT;
> @@ -2833,8 +2833,7 @@ static int add_submodule(const struct add_data *add_data)
> fprintf(stderr, _("A git directory for '%s' is found "
> "locally with remote(s):"),
> add_data->sm_name);
> - show_fetch_remotes(stderr, add_data->sm_name,
> - submod_gitdir_path);
> + show_fetch_remotes(stderr, submod_gitdir_path);
> free(submod_gitdir_path);
> die(_("If you want to reuse this local git "
> "directory instead of cloning again from\n"
> --
> 2.32.0.784.g92e169d3d7
> Yes, this is definitely an oversight on my part, and it looks like this topic has already made it to 'next'.
Thanks for the fix.