Re: Feature request: highlight local worktree in `worktree list`
- From
Chris Torek <chris.torek@gmail.com>
- Date
- Mar 21, 2024, 00:53 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAPx1Gvf5g3z8E0e6TmwgDc-TVFmTvSBexBGtOwB8+jh-k6G=7g@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <63dda239-1205-4aae-a3b2-10365147751c@gmail.com>
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 3:24 PM Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com> wrote:
> "git branch --list" has a much richer machinery than "git worktree list". > Perhaps the display machinery of both commands can converge in some way.
I have no concrete suggestions for such, but I will note that there is a `git for-each-ref` plumbing command for refs, but no `git for-each-worktree` plumbing command for worktrees. Given the relationship here (each worktree has a worktree-specific set of refs), perhaps that's a point of leverage, as it were?
Chris