From: Chris Torek <chris.torek@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 00:53:15 GMT
Subject: Re: Feature request: highlight local worktree in `worktree list`
Message-ID: <CAPx1Gvf5g3z8E0e6TmwgDc-TVFmTvSBexBGtOwB8+jh-k6G=7g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <63dda239-1205-4aae-a3b2-10365147751c@gmail.com>

On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 3:24 PM Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com> wrote:
> "git branch --list" has a much richer machinery than "git worktree list".
> Perhaps the display machinery of both commands can converge in some way.

I have no concrete suggestions for such, but I will note that there is a
`git for-each-ref` plumbing command for refs, but no `git for-each-worktree`
plumbing command for worktrees.  Given the relationship here (each
worktree has a worktree-specific set of refs), perhaps that's a point
of leverage, as it were?

Chris