Re: [PATCH 2/2] attr: add flag `-r|--revisions` to work with revisions
- From
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
- Date
- Dec 7, 2022, 01:10 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAPig+cT_xz3m-3kkL_Scf0opNXkikU94kSF46VO8KHkNMWbGzg@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqedtc842m.fsf@gitster.g>
On Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 7:15 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 17 quoted lines
> Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com> writes: > > Add a new flag `--revision`/`-r` which will allow it work with > > revisions. This command will now, instead of checking the files/index, > > try and receive the blob for the given attribute file against the > > provided revision. The flag overrides checking against the index and > > filesystem and also works with bare repositories. > > As "check-attr" was not invented as a user-facing subcommand but was > a hack for debugging, I would have minded this change, but these > days people seem to treat it as if it is just one of the proper > plumbing commands, the new command line convention bothers me a > bit. No other command uses --<anything> to signal that what comes > after it is a rev. > > But I do not think of a better alternative without making the > command line ambiguous, so I'll stop at raising a concern, so that > others who may be better at UI can come up with one.
A few minor comments...
We don't usually squat on short options, such as `-r`, right from the start but only add the short alias once shown that there is demand.
Option `-r` has strong association with "recursive" elsewhere, so I'd worry about giving it such a completely different meaning here.
Rather than calling the option `--revision`, perhaps pattern it after git-restore's `--source` option which allows specifying a particular commit, tree, tag, etc.?