Re: [PATCH] t6302: simplify non-gpg cases

From: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Date: May 9, 2016, 21:37 UTC
Message-ID: <CAPig+cT_njtzMuuk=mFWraUtpZwU3OrJPho7=dbLgKf=inBFAg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOLa=ZSZqs=++Hf8CF3pWEnJqmOA9ajuX03hzLMkuQ+ehXXCVQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 4:24 PM, Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com> wrote:

Show 8 quoted lines

> On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 11:17 PM, Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
> wrote:
>> Should we cite bc9acea (ref-filter: implement %(if), %(then), and
>> %(else) atoms, 2016-04-25) here as an example of a commit for which
>> this was problematic (and which indeed broke the tests when GPG is
>> unavailable)?
>
> But it's still in pu and I'll be re-rolling it, would that be acceptable?

Ah right, therefore, no reason to cite that particular commit. Peff's description is fine as-is.