Re: [PATCH] t6302: simplify non-gpg cases
- From
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
- Date
- May 9, 2016, 17:47 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAPig+cQPbwM0+6yruK0VKKq2ujFLoCLogS7eQNN7WWgRjG5V0w@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20160509164859.GA8231@sigill.intra.peff.net>
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
> On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 12:30:43PM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote: > Since you as the author of 618310a seem to agree with this direction, > here it is as a real patch.
Thanks for working on this.
> Subject: [PATCH] t6302: simplify non-gpg cases > > When commit 618310a taught t6302 to run without the GPG
618310a (t6302: skip only signed tags rather than all tests when GPG is missing, 2016-03-06)
Show 7 quoted lines
> prerequisite, it did so by conditionally creating the signed > tags only when gpg is available. As a result, further tests > need to take this into account, which they can do with the > test_prepare_expect helper. This is a minor hassle, though, > as the helper cannot easily cover all cases (it just matches > "signed" in the output, so all output must include the > actual refname).
Should we cite bc9acea (ref-filter: implement %(if), %(then), and %(else) atoms, 2016-04-25) here as an example of a commit for which this was problematic (and which indeed broke the tests when GPG is unavailable)?
Show 8 quoted lines
> Instead, let's take a different approach. We'll always > create the tags, and only conditionally sign them. This does > mean our tag-names are a minor lie, but it lets the tests > which do not care about signing easily behave the same in > all settings. We'll include a comment to document our lie > and avoid confusing further test-writers. > > Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Looks good. With or without the minor change below, this patch is:
Reviewed-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Show 5 quoted lines
> --- > diff --git a/t/t6302-for-each-ref-filter.sh b/t/t6302-for-each-ref-filter.sh > test_expect_success 'check signed tags with --points-at' ' > - test_prepare_expect <<-\EOF | sed -e "s/Z$//" >expect && > + cat <<-\EOF | sed -e "s/Z$//" >expect &&
To make this as close to a reversion as possible, this could be restored to the original (sans 'cat'):
sed -e "s/Z$//" >expect <<-\EOF &&
> refs/heads/side Z > refs/tags/annotated-tag four > refs/tags/four Z