Re: [Bug] Rebase from worktree subdir is broken (was Re: [PATCH v5 07/11] rebase: do not attempt to remove startup_info->original_cwd)

From: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Date: Jan 26, 2022, 00:38 UTC
Message-ID: <CAPig+cRCzUinKr0iQkDMK0Af4=47xKZJKphcuTRxt4BaxrYwfA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPig+cT3Zqa2BLsZ3ZVPCj4-bW5eb35sWXV-mYLqA-dvzC8XJg@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 7:32 PM Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> wrote:

Show 20 quoted lines

> On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 6:59 PM Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 12:27 PM Glen Choo <chooglen@google.com> wrote:
> > > +test_expect_success 'rebase when inside worktree subdirectory' '
> > > +       git init main-wt &&
> > > +       (
> > > +               cd main-wt &&
> > > +               git commit --allow-empty -m "initial" &&
> > > +               # create commit with foo/bar/baz
> > > +               mkdir -p foo/bar &&
> > > +               touch foo/bar/baz &&
> > > +               git add foo/bar/baz &&
> > > +               git commit -m "add foo/bar/baz" &&
> > > +               # create commit with a/b/c
> > > +               mkdir -p a/b &&
> > > +               touch a/b/c &&
> > > +               git add a/b/c &&
> > > +               git commit -m "add a/b/c" &&
>
> This is entirely minor, but all the inner subshells in this test are
> superfluous. [...]

One other minor comment: If the file's timestamp has no significance to the test, then our style is to create the file with `>` rather than `touch`, so:

    ... &&
    >foo/bar/baz &&
    ...
    >a/b/c &&
    ...