Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] rebase -i: re-fix short SHA-1 collision
- From
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
- Date
- Jan 20, 2020, 20:08 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAPig+cR2T26nJ1G5n82r_Xi8Y84k211n6bhBxG4Ku27vaW1pWA@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.2001202103221.46@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet>
On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 3:04 PM Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
Show 12 quoted lines
> On Mon, 20 Jan 2020, Eric Sunshine wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 6:38 PM Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget > > <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> wrote: > > > + test $colliding_sha1 = "$(git rev-parse HEAD | cut -c 1-7)" && > > > > How much do we care that this is introducing new code with git > > upstream of a pipe (considering recent efforts to eradicate such > > usage)? Same question regarding several other new instances introduce > > by this patch. > > I would argue that the test case will fail if the `git` call fails. So I > am not overly concerned if that `git` call is upstream of a pipe.
Unless the git command crashes _after_ it produces the correct output...