Re: [PATCH v14 2/4] ref-filter: make ref_array_item allocation more consistent
- From
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
- Date
- Apr 11, 2018, 18:56 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAPig+cQzWAbEVBJ8O0yKYHQ02EaGTx9CeUyF67xozeT2-FL0EA@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAGZ79kYeM=CqKSWTL2tdDXWueMGoki4zAUmFy4wbhtagN7gEAA@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 2:07 PM, Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> wrote:
Show 21 quoted lines
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 10:57 AM, Harald Nordgren > <haraldnordgren@gmail.com> wrote: >> There have been no new comments for the last few days. I know Jeff >> King will be away for the next two weeks, but should we still move >> forward with this? The initial reactions to the idea seemed positive. > > Please see the "What's cooking?" email on the mailing list that is > sent out periodically by Junio. > >> * jk/ref-array-push (2018-04-09) 3 commits >> - ref-filter: factor ref_array pushing into its own function >> - ref-filter: make ref_array_item allocation more consistent >> - ref-filter: use "struct object_id" consistently >> (this branch is used by hn/sort-ls-remote.) >> >> API clean-up aournd ref-filter code. >> >> Will merge to 'next'. > > It will be merged to next and if no people speak up (due to bugs > observed or such)
I would guess, however, that Harald is wondering more specifically about the "--sort" patch he added atop Peff's patches. Disposition for _that_ patch is not specified in the latest "What's cooking":
* hn/sort-ls-remote (2018-04-09) 1 commit
- ls-remote: create '--sort' option
(this branch uses jk/ref-array-push.) "git ls-remote" learned an option to allow sorting its output based
on the refnames being shown.