Re: [PATCH 3/4] tests: drop here-doc check from internal chain-linter

> On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 10:37:02PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> > I just think chainlint.pl is doing a good enough job of catching it that
> > we can rely on it. I'll be curious if Eric has input there on whether it
> > can do even better, which would remove all of the caveats from the
> > commit message.
>
> So I _think_ it's something like this:
>
> @@ -171,6 +171,9 @@ sub swallow_heredocs {
>                 my $start = pos($$b);
>                 my $indent = $tag =~ s/^\t// ? '\\s*' : '';
>                 $$b =~ /(?:\G|\n)$indent\Q$tag\E(?:\n|\z)/gc;
> +               if (pos($$b) == $start) {
> +                       die "oops, we did not find the end of the heredoc";
> +               }
>                 my $body = substr($$b, $start, pos($$b) - $start);
>                 $self->{lineno} += () = $body =~ /\n/sg;
>         }
>
> But I wasn't sure how to surface a clean error from here, since we're in
> the Lexer. Maybe we just accumulate a "problems" array here, and then
> roll those up via the TestParser? I'm not very familiar with the
> arrangement of that part of the script.

> And I say "think" because the thing I was worried about is that we'd do
> this lexing at too high a level, and accidentally walk past the end of
> the test. Which would mean getting fooled by;
>
>   test_expect_success 'this one is broken' '
>         cat >foo <<\EOF
>         oops, we are missing our here-doc end
>   '
>
>   test_expect_success 'this one is ok' '
>         cat >foo <<\EOF
>         this one is OK, but we would not want to confuse
>         its closing tag for the missing one
>         EOF
>   '
>
> But it looks like Lexer::swallow_heredocs gets to see the individual
> test snippets.