Re: [RFC/PATCH v1] Add Travis CI support
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Oct 4, 2015, 01:27 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAPc5daXkn=C-D5RQCw2w+JrHn7XZA6X-P4F-PugRe-S4Z2RO0g@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAFY1edZSNKepx_+2U=C-raOBiVK3Zh2r_Y_NO2-RtbhH_n-tdg@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Roberto Tyley <roberto.tyley@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Given this, enabling Travis CI for git/git seems pretty low risk, > are there any strong objections to it happening?
I still don't see a reason why git/git needs to be the one that is used, when somebody so interested (and I seem to see very many of them in the thread) can sacrifice his or her own fork and enable it him or herself.