From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 01:27:06 GMT
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH v1] Add Travis CI support
Message-ID: <CAPc5daXkn=C-D5RQCw2w+JrHn7XZA6X-P4F-PugRe-S4Z2RO0g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFY1edZSNKepx_+2U=C-raOBiVK3Zh2r_Y_NO2-RtbhH_n-tdg@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Roberto Tyley <roberto.tyley@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Given this, enabling Travis CI for git/git seems pretty low risk,
> are there any strong objections to it happening?

I still don't see a reason why git/git needs to be the one that is
used, when somebody
so interested (and I seem to see very many of them in the thread) can
sacrifice his or
her own fork and enable it him or herself.