Re: [PATCH 1/3] wt-status: implement opportunisitc index update correctly
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Dec 7, 2016, 20:53 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAPc5daX2CZ0=UBMuz70KwFPBDTUgAdi8WoVUJ7gNTq+QEXKxbg@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAGZ79kZHGqU2y19_uKhtVuE6vhspzPNpw-nVDnm8gLQ8u528kQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> wrote:
> > So I would expect that we'd rather fix the update_index_if_able instead by > checking for the lockfile to be in the correct state?
I actually don't expect that, after looking at other call sites of that function.