From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 20:53:14 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] wt-status: implement opportunisitc index update correctly
Message-ID: <CAPc5daX2CZ0=UBMuz70KwFPBDTUgAdi8WoVUJ7gNTq+QEXKxbg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGZ79kZHGqU2y19_uKhtVuE6vhspzPNpw-nVDnm8gLQ8u528kQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> wrote:
>
> So I would expect that we'd rather fix the update_index_if_able instead by
> checking for the lockfile to be in the correct state?

I actually don't expect that, after looking at other call sites of
that function.