Re: reftable & jgit compatibility
- From
Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwenn@gmail.com>
- Date
- Apr 4, 2024, 08:36 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAOw_e7b-zTZVGW_u6_ZY-CboHGOSWHbW7mxnqmxh+uuQa-VsTw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <Zg5Up_kSvOmQODO3@tanuki>
On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 9:20 AM Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> Different blocksizes is definitely a bit of a sore spot right now. I do > plan to expose write options via Git config options in the future, e.g. > something like "reftable.blockSize" or "reftable.restartCount". But for > all I know the CGit reftable library doesn't yet play nice with block > sizes other than 4k.
It shouldn't be too bad. Many unittests use blocksizes other than 4k simply because populating a multi-block table takes less space at smaller blocksizes.
-- Han-Wen Nienhuys - hanwenn@gmail.com - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen