From: Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwenn@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 08:36:16 GMT
Subject: Re: reftable & jgit compatibility
Message-ID: <CAOw_e7b-zTZVGW_u6_ZY-CboHGOSWHbW7mxnqmxh+uuQa-VsTw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <Zg5Up_kSvOmQODO3@tanuki>

On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 9:20 AM Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> wrote:
> Different blocksizes is definitely a bit of a sore spot right now. I do
> plan to expose write options via Git config options in the future, e.g.
> something like "reftable.blockSize" or "reftable.restartCount". But for
> all I know the CGit reftable library doesn't yet play nice with block
> sizes other than 4k.

It shouldn't be too bad. Many unittests use blocksizes other than 4k
simply because populating a multi-block table takes less space at
smaller blocksizes.

-- 
Han-Wen Nienhuys - hanwenn@gmail.com - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen