Re: [PATCH v6 0/7] make test output coloring more intuitive
- From
Adam Spiers <git@adamspiers.org>
- Date
- Dec 20, 2012, 18:08 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAOkDyE-yfFQxxgsumRB8N1zXN2LTq89=pArU-85Z+3Oyruiwxg@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20121220161110.GA10605@sigill.intra.peff.net>
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
Show 22 quoted lines
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 03:44:53PM +0000, Adam Spiers wrote: >> > diff --git a/t/test-lib.sh b/t/test-lib.sh >> > index 256f1c6..31f59af 100644 >> > --- a/t/test-lib.sh >> > +++ b/t/test-lib.sh >> > @@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ then >> > pass) >> > tput setaf 2;; # green >> > info) >> > - tput bold; tput setaf 6;; # bold cyan >> > + tput setaf 6;; # cyan >> > *) >> > test -n "$quiet" && return;; >> > esac >> > >> >> Good point, I forgot to check what it looked like with -v. Since this >> series is already on v6, is there a more lightweight way of addressing >> this tiny tweak than sending v7? > > It is ultimately up to Junio, but I suspect he would be OK if you just > reposted patch 4/7 with the above squashed.
I'll do that if Junio is OK with that.
> Or even just said "I like > this, please squash it into patch 4 (change info messages from > yellow/brown to bold cyan).
Yes, I'm OK with this way too :) Of course "bold" would need to be dropped from the commit message.