Re: [PATCH v2] blame: avoid checking if a file exists on the working tree if a revision is provided
- From
Edmundo Carmona Antoranz <eantoranz@gmail.com>
- Date
- Nov 17, 2015, 23:47 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAOc6etY9cXm04KdqUdRE11xtG+7Yj3ihkB4-OTweyWyGF8gs0g@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAOc6etbjCYRp4gbSNRtcngwbh93R67JYZHJn0=D=FeiBm5=FNw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Edmundo Carmona Antoranz <eantoranz@gmail.com> wrote:
> So, do I forget about the blame patch (given that I'm not fixing an > advertised syntax, even if it's supported) and fix annotate instead or > do I fix both? And if I should swing for both, do I create a single > patch or a chain of two patches, one for each builtin?
Actually, cmd_annotate will call cmd_blame so this patch actually fixes annotate as well (nice unintended consequence).
So I guess it will be a single patch. Let me work on the tests and then I'll send a patch that will hopefully cover all raised points.
Cheers!