Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] port the filtering part of branch.c to use ref-filter APIs
- From
Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
- Date
- Sep 21, 2015, 06:11 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAOLa=ZSyMV04wjhdM11RK9z8fz5tHM4PzPBxrN8_VA_Cacw82g@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <vpqwpvkgblz.fsf@anie.imag.fr>
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 12:30 AM, Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr> wrote:
Show 23 quoted lines
> Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com> writes: > >> --- a/t/t3203-branch-output.sh >> +++ b/t/t3203-branch-output.sh >> @@ -145,8 +145,8 @@ EOF >> >> test_expect_success 'git branch `--sort` option' ' >> cat >expect <<-\EOF && >> - * (HEAD detached from fromtag) >> branch-two >> + * (HEAD detached from fromtag) >> branch-one >> master >> EOF > > I thought this was obviously wrong, but this tests uses > --sort=objectsize, so it's OK. Indeed, HEAD and branch-one have > objectsize=215, and branch-two has objectsize=167. > > So, the previous code was hardcoding "detached HEAD always comes first", > but we now sort the whole list, including detached HEAD, so branch-two > comes first. >
Yeah! Even Junio said this was better, and even I think this is what the user would expect.
-- Regards, Karthik Nayak