git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [PATCH 1/2] t5410: test receive-pack connectivity check

From
Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Date
May 20, 2025, 09:11 UTC
Message-ID
<CAOLa=ZRz8iAF8DhtMnt_usaWSTxjiHQNprGXES6mRAWK4QTG5w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To
<20250520014920.201736-2-jltobler@gmail.com>
Justin Tobler <jltobler@gmail.com> writes:
Show 23 quoted lines
> As part of git-recieve-pack(1), the connectivity of objects is checked.
> Add a test validating that git-receive-pack(1) fails due to an incoming
> packfile that would leave the repository with missing objects. Instead
> of creating a new test file, "t5410" is generalized for receive-pack
> testing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Justin Tobler <jltobler@gmail.com>
> ---
>  t/meson.build                                 |  2 +-
>  ...ck-alternates.sh => t5410-receive-pack.sh} | 23 ++++++++++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>  rename t/{t5410-receive-pack-alternates.sh => t5410-receive-pack.sh} (57%)
>
> diff --git a/t/meson.build b/t/meson.build
> index 43c9750b88..6b7c0b167b 100644
> --- a/t/meson.build
> +++ b/t/meson.build
> @@ -628,7 +628,7 @@ integration_tests = [
>    't5407-post-rewrite-hook.sh',
>    't5408-send-pack-stdin.sh',
>    't5409-colorize-remote-messages.sh',
> -  't5410-receive-pack-alternates.sh',
> +  't5410-receive-pack.sh',

I think this is much better that creating a new test file, since currently the file houses only 2 tests. When we do start adding a lot more tests we can branch out as necessary.

Show 34 quoted lines
>    't5411-proc-receive-hook.sh',
>    't5500-fetch-pack.sh',
>    't5501-fetch-push-alternates.sh',
> diff --git a/t/t5410-receive-pack-alternates.sh b/t/t5410-receive-pack.sh
> similarity index 57%
> rename from t/t5410-receive-pack-alternates.sh
> rename to t/t5410-receive-pack.sh
> index 4e82fd102e..9afea54a26 100755
> --- a/t/t5410-receive-pack-alternates.sh
> +++ b/t/t5410-receive-pack.sh
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>  #!/bin/sh
>
> -test_description='git receive-pack with alternate ref filtering'
> +test_description='git receive-pack'
>
>  GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=main
>  export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME
> @@ -41,4 +41,25 @@ test_expect_success 'with core.alternateRefsPrefixes' '
>  	test_cmp expect actual.haves
>  '
>
> +test_expect_success 'receive-pack missing objects fails connectivity check' '
> +	test_when_finished rm -rf repo remote.git setup.git &&
> +
> +	git init repo &&
> +	git -C repo commit --allow-empty -m 1 &&
> +	git clone --bare repo setup.git &&
> +	git -C repo commit --allow-empty -m 2 &&
> +
> +	# Capture git-send-pack(1) output sent to git-receive-pack(1).
> +	git -C repo send-pack ../setup.git --all \
> +		--receive-pack="tee ${SQ}$(pwd)/out${SQ} | git-receive-pack" &&
> +

We don't remove 'out' with 'test_when_finished' but that's okay since 'tee' overrides the file by default. Makes sense.

Show 12 quoted lines
> +	# Replay captured git-send-pack(1) output on new empty repository.
> +	git init --bare remote.git &&
> +	git receive-pack remote.git <out >actual 2>err &&
> +
> +	test_grep "missing necessary objects" actual &&
> +	test_grep "fatal: Failed to traverse parents" err &&
> +	test_must_fail git -C remote.git cat-file -e $(git -C repo rev-parse HEAD)
> +'
> +
>  test_done
> --
> 2.49.0.111.g5b97a56fa0
Previous: Justin ToblerNext: Justin Tobler
Message 10 of 25 in “builtin/receive-pack: introduce option to skip connectivity checks”
  1. 0/2 builtin/receive-pack: introduce option to skip connectivity checksJustin Tobler, May 7, 2025
  2. 1/2 t5412: test receive-pack connectivity checkJustin Tobler, May 7, 2025
  3. Patrick SteinhardtMay 7, 2025
  4. Justin ToblerMay 19, 2025
  5. 2/2 builtin/receive-pack: add option to skip connectivity checkJustin Tobler, May 7, 2025
  6. Patrick SteinhardtMay 7, 2025
  7. Junio C HamanoMay 7, 2025
  8. 0/2 builtin/receive-pack: introduce option to skip connectivity checksJustin Tobler, May 20, 2025
  9. 1/2 t5410: test receive-pack connectivity checkJustin Tobler, May 20, 2025
  10. Karthik NayakMay 20, 2025
  11. 2/2 builtin/receive-pack: add option to skip connectivity checkJustin Tobler, May 20, 2025
  12. Patrick SteinhardtMay 20, 2025
  13. Justin ToblerMay 20, 2025
  14. Karthik NayakMay 20, 2025
  15. 0/2 builtin/receive-pack: introduce option to skip connectivity checksJustin Tobler, May 20, 2025
  16. 1/2 t5410: test receive-pack connectivity checkJustin Tobler, May 20, 2025
  17. 2/2 builtin/receive-pack: add option to skip connectivity checkJustin Tobler, May 20, 2025
  18. Johannes SchindelinJun 2, 2025
  19. Justin ToblerJun 2, 2025
  20. Johannes SchindelinJun 2, 2025
  21. Junio C HamanoJun 2, 2025
  22. Patrick SteinhardtJun 3, 2025
  23. Johannes SchindelinJun 5, 2025
  24. Patrick SteinhardtJun 5, 2025
  25. Karthik NayakMay 22, 2025

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.