Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] [GSOC] ref-filter: add %(raw) atom

From: ZheNing Hu <adlternative@gmail.com>
Date: Jun 5, 2021, 08:05 UTC
Message-ID: <CAOLTT8ReP+zX-D2sHxODpcFeU8-Vp2C4d+G8jRb6zHTmpANb-Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAP8UFD0xyOseUjSMUJ2fMzHo3d++PN7SOV8eXAvhqTGbkNFwaw@mail.gmail.com>

Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com> 于2021年6月5日周六 下午2:45写道：

Show 10 quoted lines

>
> On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 7:42 AM ZheNing Hu <adlternative@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I want to mention another question:
> > If I have a new patch series about %(rest) is based on the current %(raw)
> > patch series, should I submit it immediately?
>
> Yeah, I think it's ok to send it as long as you explicitly specify
> (using a link for example) the patch series on the mailing list it
> depends on.

Ok. Because %(raw:textconv) %(raw:filter) dependent on %(raw) and %(rest), %(raw) seems to have experienced a long cycle. These codes about new atoms seem to stay in my local git repo for a long time. It may be a good thing to send them earlier. :)

Thanks.