Re: [PATCH 2/2] [GSOC] ref-filter: add %(raw) atom
- From
ZheNing Hu <adlternative@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jun 3, 2021, 14:06 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAOLTT8QjnFqXHRzAPnJStf4Ra189dZFe9k-Y9COoSCwW47CXiA@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAOLTT8TiyAtJfcrPoBF6SECfaKOTKt24NSOtTmf84JwHrU8g1A@mail.gmail.com>
ZheNing Hu <adlternative@gmail.com> 于2021年6月3日周四 下午1:36写道:
Show 13 quoted lines
> > Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> 于2021年6月3日周四 上午10:38写道: > > But I do not think we want to add the new change at this location, > > at least for two reasons: > > > > * The posted patch checks '!arg' to avoid rejecting "raw:size", > > which would not scale at all. What if you wanted to later add > > "raw:upcase", which you must reject? > > > > Yeah, the code here makes "raw" lack of scalability. Especially we > want to add "%(raw:textconv)" and "%(raw:filter)" later. >
Now I am building %(raw:textconv) and %(raw:filter), the code will be very difficult to write:
if (format->quote_style && !strncmp(sp, "raw", 3)
&& ((!arg) || (!strncmp(arg,
":textconv", 9)) || (!strncmp(arg, ":filter", 7))))
return strbuf_addf_ret(err, -1, _("--format=%.*s
cannot be used with"
"--python, --shell, --tcl, --perl"),
(int)(ep-atom), atom);Is there any good way?
Thanks. -- ZheNing Hu