Re: [PATCH 14/19] [GSOC] cat-file: reuse ref-filter logic
- From
ZheNing Hu <adlternative@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jul 12, 2021, 13:51 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAOLTT8QzBQOJahy2_MX_ShwErfxgwfGByfsjdZBy2C=qStCswA@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAP8UFD1NfCXDVwaVWKvTWofFHbLee=JRzr4sQBecMMaqi0eWBw@mail.gmail.com>
Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com> 于2021年7月12日周一 下午9:26写道:
Show 11 quoted lines
> > > > > I wonder if the above function and some of the tests below could be > > introduced in a preparatory patch before this one. It could help check > > that reusing ref-filter doesn't change the behavior with some atoms > > that were previously supported or rejected. Of course if some atoms > > are now failing or are now supported, then it's ok to add new tests > > for these atoms in this patch. > > For example maybe some of the tests could be introduced earlier when > the reject_atom() function is introduced.
Yeah, move it to "[GSOC] ref-filter: add %(rest) atom" is better.
Thanks. -- ZheNing Hu