Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] builtin: add a repository parameter for builtin functions
- From
John Cai <johncai86@gmail.com>
- Date
- Sep 13, 2024, 17:54 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAOCgCUJO-W3KGqp99rQknxmHVBS9+5F5fEZOU4aQT_0vmhON6Q@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <ZuLItS8eruz2b_D7@pks.im>
On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 6:55 AM Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> wrote:
Show 16 quoted lines
> > On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 06:50:40AM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 06:43:20AM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > > > > > I do feel like I have only started seeing it in the last month or so. I > > > wonder if a new version of binutils changed behavior or something. > > > > Since I had that Makefile reproduction, I ran it against an older > > version of binutils. And yeah, it produces the same outcome. So it is > > probably just some kind of Baader-Meinhof phenomenon. > > I was also reading through recent changes in binutils and couldn't spot > anything. But in any case, I also had the feeling that this only started > to pop up recently. Maybe it's not a change in binutils, but in our own > build instructions. I couldn't find any smoking guns there either, > though.
Sorry everyone. I totally missed that the garbage file got checked in accidentally. my apologies.
> > Patrick