Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] support remote archive via stateless transport

From

Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@gmail.com>

Date

Jan 21, 2024, 04:09 UTC

Message-ID

<CANYiYbF63Nc=ehHmp0c3K=Xa9qrzzV+K-5u5KR50pDy3AuDS3A@mail.gmail.com>

In-Reply-To

<owly1qabhh19.fsf@fine.c.googlers.com>

On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 4:43 AM Linus Arver <linusa@google.com> wrote:

>
> Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@gmail.com> writes:
>
> This v5 looks good code-wise. I've made small suggestions to make the
> commit messages better, but they are just nits and you are free to
> ignore them.

> If you choose to reroll one more time, one additional thing you could do
> is to use the word "protocol_v2" in all commit messages because that's
> how that term looks like in the code (unless the "protocol-v2" string is
> already the standard term used elsewhere).

Will s/protocol_v2/protocol v2/