Re: [PATCH 01/15] builtin/add.c: rearrange xcalloc arguments
- From
Brian Gesiak <modocache@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 27, 2014, 02:22 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAN7MxmUPH5-qgZQ-Wm0GeenNmqHvtwtx5WkXynNX9zRP3Yr1tQ@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20140526231156.GA8570@hudson.localdomain>
My apologies! I based my work off of maint, branching off of eea591.
My reasoning was that Documentation/SubmittingPatches states that "a bugfix should be based on 'maint'". [1] Now that I think about it, this is probably not the kind of "bug" that statement had in mind.
Should I reroll the patch based on master?
- Brian Gesiak
[1] https://github.com/git/git/blob/4a28f169ad29ba452e0e7bea2583914c10c58322/Documentation/SubmittingPatches#L9
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 8:11 AM, Jeremiah Mahler <jmmahler@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 36 quoted lines
> Brian, > > On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:33:42AM +0900, Brian Gesiak wrote: >> xcalloc takes two arguments: the number of elements and their size. >> run_add_interactive passes the arguments in reverse order, passing the >> size of a char*, followed by the number of char* to be allocated. >> Rearrgange them so they are in the correct order. >> >> Signed-off-by: Brian Gesiak <modocache@gmail.com> >> --- >> builtin/add.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/builtin/add.c b/builtin/add.c >> index 672adc0..488acf4 100644 >> --- a/builtin/add.c >> +++ b/builtin/add.c >> @@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ int run_add_interactive(const char *revision, const char *patch_mode, >> int status, ac, i; >> const char **args; >> >> - args = xcalloc(sizeof(const char *), (pathspec->nr + 6)); >> + args = xcalloc((pathspec->nr + 6), sizeof(const char *)); >> ac = 0; >> args[ac++] = "add--interactive"; >> if (patch_mode) >> > > This patch doesn't apply to any of the branches I have available > (master, pu, next). And there is no line containing "pathspec->nr + 6" > anywhere in my builtin/add.c. Which branch is your work based off? > > -- > Jeremiah Mahler > jmmahler@gmail.com > http://github.com/jmahler