Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] tag: only respect `pager.tag` in list-mode
- From
- Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com>
- Date
- Aug 4, 2017, 04:21 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAN0heSpzg4jCMetyhdpQn2Zz7nDhv1X14SLQ26WvnRDe9NYCCg@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20170803192947.7x5tadwb7lxermdk@sigill.intra.peff.net>
On 3 August 2017 at 21:29, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
Show 22 quoted lines
> On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 09:40:48PM +0200, Martin Ågren wrote: > >> This is the third version of my attempt to make `pager tag` useful (v1 >> at [1], v2 at [2]). Thanks to Junio and Peff for comments on v2. > > This looks good to me overall. One minor question from the interdiff: > >> diff --git a/t/t7006-pager.sh b/t/t7006-pager.sh >> index 8b2ffb1aa..9128ec5ac 100755 >> --- a/t/t7006-pager.sh >> +++ b/t/t7006-pager.sh >> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ test_expect_success TTY 'git tag with no args defaults to paging' ' >> test_expect_success TTY 'git tag with no args respects pager.tag' ' >> # no args implies -l so this should page like -l >> rm -f paginated.out && >> - test_terminal git -c pager.tag=no tag && >> + test_terminal git -c pager.tag=false tag && >> ! test -e paginated.out >> ' > > These should behave the same, right? So this is just a style/consistency > fix, not a bugfix?
Right. I realized I was using "false" everywhere else. It wouldn't have hurt to exercise the config-parsing a tiny bit differently, but I assume that's already being done explicitly in some other test, so I went for consistency.
Thanks for all the feedback and thoughts throughout the different versions of this series. It changed quite a bit since v1, so thanks a lot.
Martin