Re: [PATCH] l10n: de.po: translate 27 new messages
- From
Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com>
- Date
- Feb 8, 2014, 20:20 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAN0XMOLmcj0pqtbfGL7u+FOAg5_dv3+5Twb=SFju7BW=vkq1YQ@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <87vbwpbcjx.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
2014-02-08 20:59 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>:
Show 21 quoted lines
> Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com> writes: > >> 2014-02-08 20:22 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>: >>> "verberge keine aufgepfropften Commits" seems much more in the spirit of >>> the original terminology. "verbirgt keine Commits mit künstlichen >>> Vorgängern" is plainly wrong anyway since it is not the commits _with_ >>> grafts which are hidden but rather the commits _provided_ by grafts. >>> >> >> Maybe "verbirgt keine Commits auf Basis künstlicher Vorgänger"? > > No. If at all "Verbirgt keine künstlichen Vorgänger" or "keine > künstlichen Vorgängercommits" since the "künstlicher Vorgänger" _is_ the > commit that is hidden: the graft, if we are being totally meticulous, is > the list of artificial parents for a given commit. The option, when > activated, hides those artificial parents. > > And "Do not" is not "Does not", so "Verbirgt" seems also wrong as it > likely should be "Verberge" (imperative). But then it would depend on > the overall style in which this imperative is usually translated. >
Oh, I seem to have misunderstood the thing :/ So I'd be "verbirgt keine künstlichen Vorgänger-Commits". For short descriptions of options we currently don't use the imperative. This should be changed. Thanks
> -- > David Kastrup