Re: [GSoC] Unify ref-filter formats with other --pretty formats
- From
- Kapil Jain <jkapil.cs@gmail.com>
- Date
- Mar 27, 2019, 17:01 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAMknYENndiGBkC75aaYwWQZ0rkR5Nn=2L8f-PTzBNOXmhhHWZA@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAL21Bmn0BQirS=vyTRHBx_kfuEp1JY4uw2wkjm5w_pgwgjA5iA@mail.gmail.com>
Show 7 quoted lines
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 2:48 AM Olga Telezhnaya <olyatelezhnaya@gmail.com> wrote: >> Kapil Jain <jkapil.cs@gmail.com> wrote: > > Now, the verify_ref_format function can be used inside > > get_commit_format function, hence reusing logic. > > Is this a correct example to work on, for this project ? > > Hi! Yes, in my opinion your example looks like good starting point.
I read through the code of both functions, and I think they are different. Please point out if I missed to see the similarity.
or may be it seemed that way, because they both deal with different formats. So, first should a translating function (pretty to ref-filter) be written ?
Show 5 quoted lines
> > Other than this I can't find any other example, for this project in > > pretty.* and ref-filter.* > > Perhaps some examples could be found in command specific files, right ? > > Other parts of the project are about reusing other ref-filter logic.
So, the project is not limited to reusing ref-filter logics in pretty, it is about reusing ref-filter logic wherever possible, right ?
> For example, we could try to reuse format_ref_array_item() from > ref-filter.h.
where can format_ref_array_item() be reused ?
Show 6 quoted lines
> I haven't dig into pretty.c logic much, but I guess it > is possible to translate "pretty" formatting commands to ref-filter > ones. That will allow us to remove similar logic from pretty.c. Our > final goal is to minimise code duplication and to have one unified > interface to extract all needed data from object and to print it > properly.
I looked, and yes some, but not all pretty formats are translatable. For example: %GP, %p, %P. are not translatable to ref-filter. or is there a workaround to translate them ?
It looks like to reuse ref-filter logic, a translator from pretty to ref-filter needs to be built. So, building a translator would be a starting point ? and then second step would be to recognise places where ref-filter can be reused, right ?
Show 9 quoted lines
> > what is atom ? is it a piece of a whole document ? and what is meant > > by used atoms ? > > I had the same question in my beginning. Please have a look at [1]. > Another good question - what is object. You could ensure that you > understand this by reading [2]. > > [1] https://git-scm.com/docs/git-for-each-ref#_field_names > [2] https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Git-Internals-Git-Objects
Thanks, this helped.