Re: Please discuss: what "git push" should do when you do not say what to push?
- From
- Marcus D. Hanwell <marcus.hanwell@kitware.com>
- Date
- Mar 18, 2012, 05:43 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAMkPkZVuW-5=o=pdfrymVkPu3k_DS1DDH_wuGXoXnq3=Z+LN_w@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <4F655E53.6030408@zytor.com>
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 12:02 AM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
Show 17 quoted lines
> On 03/17/2012 11:43 AM, fREW Schmidt wrote: >> On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 12:10 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote: >>> >>> There is a proposal to change the default behaviour of 'git push' on the >>> Git mailing list. The goal of this message is to encourage you to discuss >>> it before it happens (or the change is aborted, depending on the outcome >>> of the discussion). >> >> I personally much prefer the one where it pushes the current branch to >> its tracking branch only. That leaves very little room for surprises >> and mistakes (the one exception being git push after git checkout -b >> new-branch origin/master.) >> > > I would agree with this being the least surprising behavior. I believe > this is what push.default = upstream does. >
I agree that the least surprising default is to push the current branch to its tracking branch only. It always surprised me that other branches tried to push too.
Marcus