Re: Please discuss: what "git push" should do when you do not say what to push?
- From
Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff@gmail.com>
- Date
- Mar 20, 2012, 14:12 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CACPiFCKbfgSZMnpc6Q_Lg6n5YMHQ2bad-bwQsyASk0eMuiAFTQ@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vty1ndcoi.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 1:22 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> If the conclusion of the discussion is that we will change the default, > the transition to the new default will go like this:
I am in general agreement with the course of action outlined. There is one little thing I had expected in addition, that is not discussed:
--force should change behaviour, immediately, to "current" or even none (forcing the user to name the remote and branch explicitly).
The potential for messups with --force combined with "matching" and a repo that allows it is considerable. And I cannot imagine any mainstream use cases for --force defaulting to matching; at least none important enough to counterbalance the damage.
cheers,
m
-- martin.langhoff@gmail.com martin@laptop.org -- Software Architect - OLPC - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff