Re: [PATCH v3] build: add default aliases
- From
Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
- Date
- Sep 24, 2013, 10:25 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAMP44s3nQv97B2=mq-mn8S41sMA43qRfr+nC7eQ=Jft=zRgTRw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAEBDL5WQLx4rsN+yRs62fgTBWkuAhCSWDRkoCc8M_akpSqMKvg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 4:19 AM, John Szakmeister <john@szakmeister.net> wrote:
Show 19 quoted lines
> On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Felipe Contreras > <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> wrote: >> For now simply add a few common aliases. >> >> co = checkout >> ci = commit >> rb = rebase >> st = status >> >> Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> >> --- >> >> I still think we should ship a default /etc/gitconfig, but the project needs to >> agree it's a good change, and nobody every agrees changes are good. So this is >> the minimal change that achieves the desired result. > > I wish you would stop attacking the project every time you send a > patch--it's simply not productive and it's certainly not getting you > any closer to a resolution.
I'm not attacking the project, I'm making an objective claim, and I can back it up with several instances of evidence where 99% of the users would benefit from a change, yet it does not move forward.
If you don't agree my comment is accurate, that's one thing, but labeling it as an attack is another.
I would admit I was wrong if an /etc/gitconfig is indeed shipped by default, and agree that the Git project is indeed welcome to change, but that's not going to happen.
-- Felipe Contreras